Search alternatives:
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
selection p » selection _ (Expand Search), selections _ (Expand Search), selection step (Expand Search)
p decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
large decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), large increases (Expand Search), large degree (Expand Search)
selection p » selection _ (Expand Search), selections _ (Expand Search), selection step (Expand Search)
p decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…If power was above the threshold (<i>z</i> > 1.96) for a minimum of 10% of the time window (500 ms) after the cue, the channel was considered hemifield-selective. Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
5
-
6
The capture efficiency of BioMagnetic solutions FerroSelect in PBS/1% BSA and whole blood showed a decrease in capture efficiency when moving to whole blood.
Published 2025“…<p>The capture efficiency of BioMagnetic solutions FerroSelect in PBS/1% BSA and whole blood showed a decrease in capture efficiency when moving to whole blood.…”
-
7
ROC analysis to mark selectivity results in mostly mixed-selective units.
Published 2025“…The large number of mixed selective units also results in a significant decrease in accuracy when these neurons are targeted as compared to <a href="http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013559#pcbi.1013559.g006" target="_blank">Fig 6c</a> where there was no significant effect visible after targeting mixed selective units, likely because there were less mixed selective units present. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Geographical distribution of large cities and small cities.
Published 2024“…The Figure reveals two patterns: 1) the maximum level of innovation is higher in large cities (2.53) than in small cities (2.02); 2) among large cities in <b>a</b>, innovation levels in general decrease with nightlight density. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20