Search alternatives:
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
case decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
show case » show same (Expand Search)
_ largest » _ large (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
case decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
show case » show same (Expand Search)
_ largest » _ large (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
A summary of the included study characteristics.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
List of Included studies.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”
-
16
The search strategy in three databases.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”
-
17
NIH score.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”
-
18
List of excluded studies.
Published 2025“…Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results show that one month after the NSPT, there was no significant difference in the mean visfatin level of GCF (SMD: -3.91, 95%CI: -9.83, 2.01, p = 0.195, I-square, 96.6%, random effect model, n = 2) and serum (SMD: -0.33, 95%CI: -0.98, 0.33, p = 0.332, fixed effect model, n = 1), but 2, 3 and 6 months after NSPT, the mean visfatin level of GCF and serum decreased significantly. …”
-
19
-
20