Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), level disease (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
-
19521
Selection flow chart of study participants.
Published 2025“…In contrast, these associations were not statistically significant among those with ideal sleep duration (heating: HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.77–1.65, P = 0.537; cooking: HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 0.90–1.81, P = 0.165).…”
-
19522
-
19523
-
19524
Tumoral Nanovesicles-Loaded Magnetotactic Bacteria for Tumor-Targeted Therapy under a Swing Magnetic Field
Published 2025“…Finally, it is revealed that the NVs-loaded AMB-1 induced a decrease in cellular viability and significantly inhibited the growth of tumors <i>in vivo</i> under the sMF. …”
-
19525
Raw data.
Published 2025“…In the PTZ-induced seizure model, the application of CAF in doses over 50 mg/L resulted in a decrease in the average movement. TPM ( > 50 μM) significantly protected larvae against the PTZ. …”
-
19526
Tumoral Nanovesicles-Loaded Magnetotactic Bacteria for Tumor-Targeted Therapy under a Swing Magnetic Field
Published 2025“…Finally, it is revealed that the NVs-loaded AMB-1 induced a decrease in cellular viability and significantly inhibited the growth of tumors <i>in vivo</i> under the sMF. …”
-
19527
-
19528
Driving variables recorded from the simulator.
Published 2025“…Additionally, HF conversation was associated with a decrease in ART among conservative participants, while it significantly increased TIBL for both moderate and conservative groups. …”
-
19529
-
19530
Moderating effect test I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19531
Descriptive statistics.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19532
Baseline regression.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19533
Robustness tests I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19534
Endogeneity tests II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19535
Endogeneity test I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19536
Heterogeneity test II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19537
Robustness tests II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19538
Heterogeneity test III.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19539
Balance test.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19540
Moderating effect test II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”