Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
level increased » levels increased (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search), gene increased (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
-
19481
Schedule of the trial.
Published 2025“…Vaccination against canine leishmaniasis intends to decrease the parasite burden and the risk of clinical disease. …”
-
19482
Clinical symptoms scoring system.
Published 2025“…Vaccination against canine leishmaniasis intends to decrease the parasite burden and the risk of clinical disease. …”
-
19483
Tumoral Nanovesicles-Loaded Magnetotactic Bacteria for Tumor-Targeted Therapy under a Swing Magnetic Field
Published 2025“…Finally, it is revealed that the NVs-loaded AMB-1 induced a decrease in cellular viability and significantly inhibited the growth of tumors <i>in vivo</i> under the sMF. …”
-
19484
Raw data.
Published 2025“…In the PTZ-induced seizure model, the application of CAF in doses over 50 mg/L resulted in a decrease in the average movement. TPM ( > 50 μM) significantly protected larvae against the PTZ. …”
-
19485
Tumoral Nanovesicles-Loaded Magnetotactic Bacteria for Tumor-Targeted Therapy under a Swing Magnetic Field
Published 2025“…Finally, it is revealed that the NVs-loaded AMB-1 induced a decrease in cellular viability and significantly inhibited the growth of tumors <i>in vivo</i> under the sMF. …”
-
19486
-
19487
Marketed vaccines against canine leishmaniasis.
Published 2025“…Vaccination against canine leishmaniasis intends to decrease the parasite burden and the risk of clinical disease. …”
-
19488
-
19489
Moderating effect test I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19490
Descriptive statistics.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19491
Baseline regression.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19492
Robustness tests I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19493
Endogeneity tests II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19494
Endogeneity test I.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19495
Heterogeneity test II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19496
Robustness tests II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19497
Heterogeneity test III.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19498
Balance test.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19499
Moderating effect test II.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”
-
19500
Variable definitions.
Published 2025“…Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. …”