Search alternatives:
significant increases » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
increases release » increased release (Expand Search), increased reliance (Expand Search), increases reversal (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant increases » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search), significant decrease (Expand Search)
increases release » increased release (Expand Search), increased reliance (Expand Search), increases reversal (Expand Search)
teer decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…”
-
8
-
9
-
10
Increasing TPP side chain length decreases melanoma cell viability and clonogenic survival.
Published 2020“…The error bars for all data presented in Fig 2 represent the mean ± SEM. Results demonstrate that TPP derivatives decrease melanoma cell viability and clonogenic survival; and there is a structure-activity relationship between TPP side chain length and decreased viability and clonogenic survival.…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
C1 alone does not evoke NO release, an increase in cell activity or release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Published 2023“…As shown in <b><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0278325#pone.0278325.g001" target="_blank">Fig 1</a></b>, LPS stimulation induced a significant increase in NO release (p<0.0001). Treatment with C1 or DMSO did not show any significant difference compared to untreated microglia (in white). …”
-
15
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20