Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
361
-
362
-
363
-
364
-
365
Data - willing to pay of dog owners.
Published 2025“…Male dog owners and dog owners belonging to lower age groups had significantly higher AT towards leashing dogs. Sixty two percent of dog owners were WTP for the suggested price bid amounts; but, in general, their number decreased when price of the vaccine increased. …”
-
366
Data - intention of dog owners.
Published 2025“…Male dog owners and dog owners belonging to lower age groups had significantly higher AT towards leashing dogs. Sixty two percent of dog owners were WTP for the suggested price bid amounts; but, in general, their number decreased when price of the vaccine increased. …”
-
367
Map of the study area (shaded in gray).
Published 2025“…Male dog owners and dog owners belonging to lower age groups had significantly higher AT towards leashing dogs. Sixty two percent of dog owners were WTP for the suggested price bid amounts; but, in general, their number decreased when price of the vaccine increased. …”
-
368
-
369
-
370
<i>Oenocarpus bacaba</i> palm tree (A) and fruit (B).
Published 2024“…Serological cure was achieved in 34.6% of cases, and IgG titers decreased in 15.3%.</p><p>Conclusions and significance</p><p>We encountered several barriers in managing ACD, including population vulnerability, reliance on outdated diagnostic techniques, lack of standardized molecular biology methods, and limited therapeutic options. …”
-
371
-
372
-
373
-
374
-
375
Data supporting this article.
Published 2025“…Clinical variables did not significantly differed between FR and SM groups. Mean VAS decreased by −12.3 mm ± 15.2 in FR group (n = 15) and −17.9 mm ± 29.4 in SM group (n = 15). …”
-
376
Demographic and clinical data at baseline.
Published 2025“…Clinical variables did not significantly differed between FR and SM groups. Mean VAS decreased by −12.3 mm ± 15.2 in FR group (n = 15) and −17.9 mm ± 29.4 in SM group (n = 15). …”
-
377
Changes in clinical variables.
Published 2025“…Clinical variables did not significantly differed between FR and SM groups. Mean VAS decreased by −12.3 mm ± 15.2 in FR group (n = 15) and −17.9 mm ± 29.4 in SM group (n = 15). …”
-
378
-
379
-
380