Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance a » significance _ (Expand Search), significance b (Expand Search), significance p (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance a » significance _ (Expand Search), significance b (Expand Search), significance p (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
701
Variables.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
702
Results of the parallel trend test.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
703
Results of the exclusion of other policies.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
704
Results of robustness tests.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
705
Descriptive statistical of variables.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
706
Baseline regression results.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
707
The results of mediating mechanism test.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
708
The results of Bootstrap Method and Sobel Test.
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
709
Impact of the NAMR on CSR dimensions (E, S, G).
Published 2025“…Our analyses underline a significant decrease in the environment and governance CSR among non-financial firms, while no significant impact is observed on the social dimension of CSR. …”
-
710
-
711
-
712
Effect of ex vivo treatment with rhTGFβ1 or a TGFβ1 inhibitor on monocyte responses to rgE stimulation. Monocytes and NK cells purified from PBMC collected from 10 RZV recipients (demographics in S4 Table) before vaccination (D0) and 90 days post-vaccination (D90) were combined ex vivo and stimulated with VZV-rgE. A subset of D0 monocyte & NK cocultures was also treated with the TGFβ1 inhibitor LY (D0 LY), and a subset of D90 cocultures were supplemented with rhTGFβ1. The graph shows individual data points, means and p values calculated by Friedman test for repeated measures with FDR correction. LY treatment of cells collected on D0 significantly increased their activation to levels similar to D90. Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.
Published 2025“…Conversely, treatment of D90 cells with rhTGFβ1 significantly decreased their activation to levels similar to D0.…”
-
713
-
714
-
715
-
716
-
717
-
718
-
719
-
720
Effects of busulfan treatment (6 mg/kg) on the epididymis and sperm of mice over a three-week period.
Published 2025“…<p>(A) The epididymal sperm concentrations decrease over time and significantly differ between hour 0 (control) and day 21 (<i>n </i>= 3 per group). …”