Search alternatives:
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Data Sheet 1_Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L..docx
Published 2025“…Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. …”
-
4
-
5
-
6
Identification of ACADM, ANGPTL4, and NFKB2 as significant predictors of OS in the TCGA-KIRC cohort.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Significant cholesterol genes arranged by day.
Published 2024“…Scatter plots of the RNASeq DESeq results, P-value vs. Fold Change for each sample day, arranged chronologically. …”
-
16
The top 10 putative metabolites with the largest negative fold change between normal and thin cows.
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
The top 10 putative metabolites with the largest positive fold change between normal and thin cows.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20
Metabolites with decreasing levels during the development.
Published 2025“…<p>Temporal profiles of polar metabolites and lipids with SCN levels significantly decreasing from E19 to P28. Rhythmicity was determined by eJTK; full or dashed lines depict the profiles that either did or did not pass the significance threshold (FDR-adjusted <i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.…”