Search alternatives:
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
significant sizes » significant size (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant shifts (Expand Search)
level decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), level increased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
significance » significantly (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients....
Published 2025“…<p>Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. …”
-
5
Transition probabilities and class sizes for three-step LTA model (N = 432).
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Sediment particle size curve.
Published 2024“…The highest average relative flows across three sediment levels occurred under the F1 treatment, measuring 0.699, 0.681, and 0.668 for type-H<sub>1</sub>, type-H<sub>2</sub>, and type-H<sub>3</sub> tapes, respectively. …”
-
12
Learn!Bio longitudinal, cross-sectional study 2020-2023: Cohort sizes and participants – overview.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
Metabolites with decreasing levels during the development.
Published 2025“…<p>Temporal profiles of polar metabolites and lipids with SCN levels significantly decreasing from E19 to P28. Rhythmicity was determined by eJTK; full or dashed lines depict the profiles that either did or did not pass the significance threshold (FDR-adjusted <i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.…”
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Each subfigure shows a different local size (LS) and context size (CS) configuration, where the reliability of the model across different initializations is measured in R-squared.
Published 2025“…<p>In most cases where both the local size and context size is small, the DSVAE model is significantly more reliable than the IDSVAE method. …”