Search alternatives:
significance set » significance _ (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
set decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significance set » significance _ (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
set decrease » step decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Female regression coefficients for regression #3 across development in set size = 2 and set size = 4.
Published 2024“…All statistics are done identically and are reported in the text. There was a slight decrease in the regression coefficient weight of intercept for set size = 2 (A), but not set size = 4 (F). …”
-
13
A Wearable Dual-Modal Patch for Rapid Pre-Hospital Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
A Wearable Dual-Modal Patch for Rapid Pre-Hospital Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published 2025Subjects: -
15
A Wearable Dual-Modal Patch for Rapid Pre-Hospital Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
-
17
Effect of session on winning model parameters for set size = 2 and set size = 4 for both male and females.
Published 2024“…<p>To test if mice adjusted one-back strategies with experience, we next compared how parameter weights (y-axis) changed across the 6 sessions analyzed for each mouse (x-axis). Since set size = 2 and set size = 4 days were interspersed, we combined set size data and analyzed sessions chronologically. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Strategy parameters across development for female mice in set size = 2 and set size = 4 from winning computational model.
Published 2024“…However, female mice had a significant decrease in parameter S1 “Inappropriate Lose-Shift” in set size = 4 (H: <i>p</i> = 0.04) with a trend in a similar direction in set size = 2 (C: <i>p</i> = 0.08).…”