Search alternatives:
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
cause difference » change difference (Expand Search), phase difference (Expand Search), rate difference (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
cause difference » change difference (Expand Search), phase difference (Expand Search), rate difference (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…(B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
3
-
4
Synaptopathy at IHC-SGN synapses decreases the peak of the CAP significantly, without changes to peak latency and width.
Published 2021“…Shaded regions correspond to the standard error of the mean and dashed lines correspond to the peaks of each CAP, labeled with the same colors as the CAPs. …”
-
5
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
Mean and standard deviation of Race and Race Evo surface roughness in different autoclaving cycles.
Published 2022Subjects: -
8
-
9
Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age.
Published 2021“…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
10
-
11
Encapsulation efficiency significantly decreases with increasing starting bacterial concentration.
Published 2022“…Encapsulation efficiency decreased with increasing starting bacterial concentrations. …”
-
12
The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.
Published 2024“…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
Bacterial taxa with a significant difference in the relative abundance between UnH and InH.
Published 2022Subjects: -
20