Showing 1 - 20 results of 95,857 for search '(( significant ((_ decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant natural increase ))', query time: 0.71s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age. by Sul-Hee Kim (11873853)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
  6. 6
  7. 7

    The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified. by Krzysztof Kochanek (835532)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

    Drug-induced decrease of cell anisotropy reduces pattern fidelity. by Camille Curantz (7456499)

    Published 2022
    “…The data underlying this figure can be found at 10.5281/zenodo.7006365. Error bars: mean with standard deviation; significance of statistical tests for anisotropy amplitude is shown with stars. …”
  16. 16

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  17. 17
  18. 18

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  19. 19
  20. 20