Search alternatives:
significantly different » significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
different decrease » different degrees (Expand Search), different degree (Expand Search), different areas (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
significantly different » significant difference (Expand Search), significant differences (Expand Search)
different decrease » different degrees (Expand Search), different degree (Expand Search), different areas (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
_ decrease » _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreasing (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
7
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Top: behavioral timescales do not differ between different groups of participants (exp. 1 and 3/4) doing the same task; Bottom: Illustration of ECoG electrode placement for all subjects for both two location (left) and four location (right) tasks for the frontal, motor and parietal regions. …”
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.
Published 2025“…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
-
16
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”