Showing 1 - 20 results of 4,480 for search '(( significant ((all decrease) OR (fold decrease)) ) OR ( significant sex decrease ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
  9. 9

    Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease). by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
  10. 10

    Association between FF Proximity and BMI by sex. by Kimberly Yuin Y’ng Wong (22766265)

    Published 2025
    “…The overall association between FF proximity and BMI was not significant but modified by sex (p-<sub>heterogeneity</sub> <0.001). …”
  11. 11

    MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models. by Qiaozhen Qin (13159201)

    Published 2025
    “…The Y-axis represents the fold change, while the X-axis indicates the significance of differential expression. …”
  12. 12

    Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes. by Yasuyuki Sotani (20114144)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20