Search alternatives:
significant trend » significant threat (Expand Search), significant threats (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
trend decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
significant trend » significant threat (Expand Search), significant threats (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
trend decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
6
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…The Y-axis represents the fold change, while the X-axis indicates the significance of differential expression. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Parallel trend test.
Published 2025“…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”
-
18
-
19
-
20