Search alternatives:
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
small decrease » small increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG glioma cells dependent on SHG-44 concentration.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> A significant decrease in the proliferative clonal capacity of U87MG colonies was observed with 70ΜM and 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment. …”
-
5
Validation of genetic markers for risk of OA or knee OA for decrease in minJSW.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A)</b> Manhattan plot of minJSW decrease at 24 months. The Manhattan plots show the -log10(P) values of all ~ 1,5 million SNPs against their position. …”
-
6
The pooled effect of all-cause mortality rate in non-health care workers and health care workers.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG GB cells following treatment with SHG-44 and cis-platin at equal concentrations.
Published 2025“…Data represent mean values ± standard deviation, n = 3. <b>Legends:</b> ns: non-significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.…”
-
8
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
9
-
10
Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on ART and TIBL across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease).…”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Annual number of outpatient visits in all eyes.
Published 2025“…<p>Mean visit frequency (mean ± standard deviation) significantly decreased from 11.5 ± 4.3 preoperatively to 8.8 ± 4.1, 5.0 ± 3.4, and 4.4 ± 3.2 visits in the first, second, and third postoperative years, respectively (Kruskal–Wallis test, P < 0.001; Dunn’s test, **P < 0.01). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20