Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
barriers decrease » barrier disease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
barriers decrease » barrier disease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
561
-
562
-
563
-
564
-
565
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
566
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
567
-
568
-
569
Abutment shoulder adhesive filling rate (AFR) of silicone rubber calculated by ImageJ.
Published 2025Subjects: -
570
-
571
Retention strength testing of the cemented crown by universal testing machine.
Published 2025Subjects: -
572
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
573
Data of Cement retention force(N) for each group in retention strength test.
Published 2025Subjects: -
574
-
575
-
576
-
577
Photograph of the implant prostheses with different hole opening strategies.
Published 2025Subjects: -
578
-
579
-
580
Results of adhesive filling rate (AFR) at abutment shoulder filling rate in each group.
Published 2025Subjects: