Showing 4,061 - 4,080 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant ((bias decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease decrease ))', query time: 0.52s Refine Results
  1. 4061
  2. 4062
  3. 4063
  4. 4064
  5. 4065
  6. 4066
  7. 4067
  8. 4068
  9. 4069
  10. 4070
  11. 4071
  12. 4072
  13. 4073
  14. 4074
  15. 4075

    Subject’s characteristics (mean ± SD). by Magdalena Podczarska-Głowacka (21560120)

    Published 2025
    “…Both groups improved knee strength, but the NHE group showed significantly greater improvements (p ≤ 0.001 for NHE, p ≤ 0.04 for control). …”
  16. 4076
  17. 4077

    Flowchart of the screening process. by Huixia Ren (500186)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The TOTVA may enhance cosmetic satisfaction, improve lymph node retrieval, and decreased postoperative complications. Nevertheless, these findings warrant cautious interpretation due to low methodological quality, high risk of bias, and limited evidence quality. …”
  18. 4078

    Result of the AMSTAR-2 assessments. by Huixia Ren (500186)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The TOTVA may enhance cosmetic satisfaction, improve lymph node retrieval, and decreased postoperative complications. Nevertheless, these findings warrant cautious interpretation due to low methodological quality, high risk of bias, and limited evidence quality. …”
  19. 4079

    Characteristics of included reviews. by Huixia Ren (500186)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The TOTVA may enhance cosmetic satisfaction, improve lymph node retrieval, and decreased postoperative complications. Nevertheless, these findings warrant cautious interpretation due to low methodological quality, high risk of bias, and limited evidence quality. …”
  20. 4080

    Result of the PRISMA assessments. by Huixia Ren (500186)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The TOTVA may enhance cosmetic satisfaction, improve lymph node retrieval, and decreased postoperative complications. Nevertheless, these findings warrant cautious interpretation due to low methodological quality, high risk of bias, and limited evidence quality. …”