Search alternatives:
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The study encompassed 36 selected studies involving 44 effect sizes and 914 participants. The effectiveness of the TRE was found to vary across health conditions, with modest weight loss observed in healthy individuals (pooled effect size -1.04 Kg, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.65) and more significant weight reduction seen in participants with chronic diseases (pooled effect size -3.33 Kg, 95% CI: -5.05 to -1.62) and overweight/obesity (pooled effect size -4.21 Kg, 95% CI: -5.23 to -3.10). …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Flow diagram representing bromeliad death by overcrowding within the Bromeliad-death procedure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
Variables for the bromeliad agent representing a single <i>T. utriculata</i> rosette.
Published 2025Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20