Comparison of broad-sense heritability estimates across and within environments for agronomic traits. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Manhattan and respective-QQ plots for agronomic traits in the 191-wheat association panel using FarmCPU. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Boxplots summarizing the differences in agronomic traits. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Principal component analysis of agronomic traits and genotypes. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Top 20 high-yielding genotypes across the seven environments (t/ha). by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

MTAs identified in multiple environments (BLUEs and individual environments) for the five agronomic traits in the association panel of spring bread wheat. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Geographic locations of the seven experimental stations used in the study. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Distribution and density of 12,954 high-quality SNPs across the 21 bread wheat chromosomes. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Descriptive statistics and genetic parameters for agronomic traits across environments. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Pearson’s correlation matrix among agronomic traits based on BLUEs. by Fatima Henkrar (17346528)

Subjects:

Relationships between the unconfined compressive strength and destructive strains εf and E₅₀: (a) Relationship between the destructive strain εf and peak strength q<sub>... by Xiaoyan Ding (291429)

Subjects:

Trends of uptake of delivery by CS and trends of the uptake of maternity incentives among women who had at least a live birth and gave birth in HFs one year prior to the three most... by Resham B. Khatri (10949429)

Subjects:

Facilities offering modern family planning services by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B). by Rajon Banik (12066099)

Subjects:

Modern family planning service readiness score by division in 2014 (A) and 2017 (B). by Rajon Banik (12066099)

Subjects:

S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”

Participant enrollment. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”