Search alternatives:
bins decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
bins decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), sizes decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
Immunomodulators with the topmost significant differences between PAS-Fiber-GCX groups.
Published 2025“…(B, C) PAS-highFIB-highGCX vs naïve-noFIB-highGCX, naïve-noFIB-noGCX, and naïve-noFIB-lowGCX are the 3 group-to-group comparisons with the topmost number of significantly differently abundant immunomodulators and have two proteins in common between them: (B) IL-1RA and (C) IL-10 Amongst the comparisons between naïve-highFIB-highGCX vs naïve-noFIB-noGCX, naïve-noFIB-highGCX, and naïve-noFIB-lowGCX, one protein was in common: (D) MIP-1β. …”
-
145
-
146
Results showing significant GM differences between the AD and HC groups.
Published 2019“…<p>Results showing significant GM differences between the AD and HC groups.…”
-
147
Alpha diversity indices and significance of differences between treatments, timepoints and their interaction.
Published 2022“…<p>Alpha diversity indices and significance of differences between treatments, timepoints and their interaction.…”
-
148
-
149
-
150
Matrices of significant differences regarding white matter changes between groups.
Published 2024“…Green fields indicate significant differences of mean values with positive direction between the groups, red fields indicate significant differences of mean values with negative direction between the groups. …”
-
151
Demographic distributions of the patients and significant differences between the training and test datasets.
Published 2022“…<p>Demographic distributions of the patients and significant differences between the training and test datasets.…”
-
152
-
153
-
154
Comparison of significant mean shape differences between the techno-structural groups.
Published 2025“…<p>Comparison of significant mean shape differences between the techno-structural groups.…”
-
155
Statistics of GMV differences between groups in the significant lobes (16 areas).
Published 2020“…<p>Statistics of GMV differences between groups in the significant lobes (16 areas).…”
-
156
Pathway analysis with significant differences between infected samples and control samples.
Published 2025“…<p>A comparative analysis using the KEGG pathways database was conducted on leaf (A) and spike (B) samples to identify pathways with significant differences between infected samples and control samples. …”
-
157
-
158
<i>Trcyc8</i> or <i>Trtup1</i> repression resulted in a significant decrease in the transcription of cellulase gene and <i>xyr1</i> transcription.
Published 2021“…Error bars are the SD from these replicates. Significant differences (<i>t</i>-test, *<i>P</i><0.05, **<i>P</i><0.01, ***<i>P</i><0.001) were detected for the transcription of <i>cel7a</i>, <i>cel7b</i>, <i>cel3a</i>, and <i>xyr1</i> between QM9414 and <i>Trcyc8</i><sup>KD</sup> or <i>Trtup1</i> repressed cells.…”
-
159
-
160