Showing 881 - 900 results of 19,563 for search '(( significant ((bins decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( significant increase decrease ))', query time: 0.70s Refine Results
  1. 881

    Evaluation results. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”
  2. 882

    Dataset with steel insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”
  3. 883

    Reference dataset. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”
  4. 884

    Dataset with aluminium insert. by Briya Tariq (19666901)

    Published 2024
    “…Evaluation metrics including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), linearity of attenuation profiles, root mean square error (RMSE), and area under the curve (AUC) were employed to assess the energy and material-density images with and without metal inserts. Results show decreased metal artefacts and a better signal-to-noise ratio (up to 25%) with increased energy bins as compared to reference data. …”
  5. 885
  6. 886
  7. 887
  8. 888
  9. 889
  10. 890
  11. 891
  12. 892
  13. 893
  14. 894
  15. 895
  16. 896
  17. 897
  18. 898
  19. 899
  20. 900