Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
bit decrease » bfrt decreased (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
bit decrease » bfrt decreased (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search)
-
761
-
762
-
763
-
764
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
765
ASDR of Tuberculosis for the 21 Global Burden of Disease regions by SDI, 1990-2021.
Published 2025Subjects: -
766
ASMR of Tuberculosis for the 21 Global Burden of Disease regions by SDI, 1990-2021.
Published 2025Subjects: -
767
-
768
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
769
-
770
-
771
-
772
-
773
-
774
-
775
-
776
-
777
-
778
-
779
-
780