Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
unit increased » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), under increased (Expand Search)
bit decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), bfrt decreased (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
unit increased » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), under increased (Expand Search)
bit decrease » point decrease (Expand Search), bfrt decreased (Expand Search), fid decreased (Expand Search)
-
461
-
462
-
463
-
464
-
465
-
466
-
467
-
468
Summary of significance levels for comparison of surgical segment ROM between different test groups.
Published 2025Subjects: -
469
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
470
Descriptive statistics of alcohol consumption in G7 countries (in litres/capita).
Published 2024Subjects: -
471
-
472
-
473
-
474
-
475
-
476
-
477
Trends of incident opioid users, L-TOT users, and L-TOT discontinuers between 2009 and 2013.
Published 2025Subjects: -
478
-
479
-
480