Search alternatives:
significant alterations » significant interactions (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search), significant interaction (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant alterations » significant interactions (Expand Search), significant attention (Expand Search), significant interaction (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats.
Published 2023Subjects: “…glutamatergic events decreased…”
-
2
-
3
Number of significant genes and fold change.
Published 2023“…</p><p>Conclusions/significance</p><p>Overall, integrating these results into our understanding of long-term programming by repeated infant pain experiences, the data suggest that pain experienced within a social context impacts infant neurobehavioral responses and initiates an altered developmental trajectory of pain and affect processing that diverges from experiencing pain alone.…”
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Gut composition changes significantly during chemoradiotherapy, adapts after treatment, and remains altered at first follow-up.
Published 2021“…Bacteria that were most significantly altered during chemoradiotherapy (between baseline and week 5; A and B) included the Clostridia class and Proteobacteria phylum. …”
-
16
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
17
TBSS results showing significant AxD and RD changes at baseline and the follow-up.
Published 2025Subjects: -
18
-
19
-
20