Search alternatives:
significant potential » significant positive (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
potential biases » potential bias (Expand Search), potential changes (Expand Search), potential biomarkers (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant potential » significant positive (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
potential biases » potential bias (Expand Search), potential changes (Expand Search), potential biomarkers (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
Egger’s publication bias plots for the assessment of potential publication bias.
Published 2019“…Asymmetry of the dot distribution between regression lines indicates potential publication bias. (A) For the risk measurement of CAL, the Egger’s plot did not show marked asymmetry, P = 0.601, t = -0.57, 95% CI (-3.22, 2.12), (B) For the risk analysis of rKD, the Egger’s plot did not show significant asymmetry, P = 0.950, t = -0.07, 95% CI (-4.87, 4.66), (C) For the evaluation of days of fever or hospital, the Egger’s plot also did not show significant asymmetry, P = 0.390, t = -1.09, 95%CI (-10.37, 6.19). …”
-
33
Percentage of US adults with health insurance coverage by income-level, age 60 to 70 years.
Published 2022Subjects: -
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
Top 20 genes with significantly decreased abundance in Aco<sup>R</sup> cells.
Published 2021Subjects: -
38
-
39
-
40