Search alternatives:
significant predicted » significantly predicted (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
predicted values » predictive values (Expand Search), predictive value (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant predicted » significantly predicted (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
predicted values » predictive values (Expand Search), predictive value (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
Forecasts of cancer patients’ medical use and expenditure (income/admission cases).
Published 2024Subjects: -
102
-
103
The effect of utilization due the characters of cancer patients (cancer type).
Published 2024Subjects: -
104
Forecasts of cancer patients’ medical use and expenditure (income/outpatient cases).
Published 2024Subjects: -
105
-
106
Expression Significance and Prognostic Value of GPR27 in Ovarian Cancer
Published 2025“…<p>This study explored the prognostic role of GPR27 and its predictive value to platinum-based therapy in ovarian cancer.…”
-
107
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–Australia.
Published 2023Subjects: -
108
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–Brazil.
Published 2023Subjects: -
109
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–Australia.
Published 2023Subjects: -
110
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–India.
Published 2023Subjects: -
111
-
112
Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–Brazil.
Published 2023Subjects: -
113
-
114
Predicted value of S1 station.
Published 2025“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”
-
115
Predicted value of S3 station.
Published 2025“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”
-
116
Predicted value of S2 station.
Published 2025“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”
-
117
Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for the prediction of hepatitis C.
Published 2025Subjects: -
118
-
119
-
120
Prediction comparison (horizontal axis: Prediction value, vertical axis: Target value).
Published 2021Subjects: