Search alternatives:
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
predictor include » predictors included (Expand Search), predictors including (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant predictor » significant predictors (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
predictor include » predictors included (Expand Search), predictors including (Expand Search)
changes decrease » change increases (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
21
Details of included studies.
Published 2023“…Five studies with 5254 patients were included. Meta-analysis of all five studies demonstrated that hypoalbuminemia was a significant predictor of mortality after CRRT (OR: 1.31 95% CI: 1.07, 1.60 I<sup>2</sup> = 72% p = 0.01). …”
-
22
-
23
Most significant predictors for the three most frequently studied outcomes.
Published 2022Subjects: -
24
-
25
Post-RARP urinary continence recovery stratified by voided volume change.
Published 2022“…<p>Kaplan-Meier curves for post-operative continence recovery to (A) use of 1 pad or less per day, and (B) pad-free status, as stratified by change in voided volume. A statistically significant difference was found for both curves, with a larger decrease in voided volume exhibiting a lower continence rate (log-rank test: P value = 0.011 and 0.008, respectively). …”
-
26
-
27
-
28
Binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis of predictors for the occurrence of ISR > 50%.
Published 2023Subjects: -
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
34
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40