Search alternatives:
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
attention phases » attention based (Expand Search), saturation phases (Expand Search), attention paid (Expand Search)
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
attention phases » attention based (Expand Search), saturation phases (Expand Search), attention paid (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Sensitivity analyses of seroprevalence with the largest sample size study omitted.
Published 2024Subjects: -
10
-
11
-
12
Projected decadal changes in seasonality in the hydrological cycle over the wetland regions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
13
Changes in decadal precipitation and JULES inundation between 1990–1999 and 2089–2098.
Published 2024Subjects: -
14
-
15
-
16
The contemporary, long-term seasonality in inundation over the whole of the Amazon basin.
Published 2024Subjects: -
17
-
18
-
19
-
20