Showing 1 - 9 results of 9 for search '(( significant ((changes decrease) OR (largest decrease)) ) OR ( significant barrier decrease ))~', query time: 0.36s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Grid division diagram. by Ming Zhang (9736)

    Published 2025
    “…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
  2. 2

    Model calculation diagram. by Ming Zhang (9736)

    Published 2025
    “…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
  3. 3

    Grid independence verification. by Ming Zhang (9736)

    Published 2025
    “…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
  4. 4

    Table 1_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.docx by Grace Folino (21738503)

    Published 2025
    “…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
  5. 5

    Image 4_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png by Grace Folino (21738503)

    Published 2025
    “…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
  6. 6

    Image 2_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png by Grace Folino (21738503)

    Published 2025
    “…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
  7. 7

    Image 3_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png by Grace Folino (21738503)

    Published 2025
    “…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
  8. 8

    Image 5_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png by Grace Folino (21738503)

    Published 2025
    “…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”
  9. 9

    Image 1_Temporal trends of cervical cancer demographics: a CDC WONDER database study.png by Grace Folino (21738503)

    Published 2025
    “…Between 2015 and 2023, there was a concerning positive change in AAMR [APC of 0.1272 (95% CI –0.3393 to 1.7502)], though not statistically significant. …”