Search alternatives:
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant linear » significant clinical (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search), significant level (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
281
-
282
-
283
-
284
-
285
-
286
-
287
Trend of specific mental health disorders for all services utilization between 2016 and 2022.
Published 2024Subjects: -
288
-
289
-
290
-
291
-
292
Decomposition of change in odds of teenage pregnancy and motherhood in Nigeria, 2003–2018.
Published 2025Subjects: -
293
-
294
-
295
-
296
-
297
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
298
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
299
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
300
Change in STAI scores after counseling.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”