Presents the overall disproportionality analysis results, demonstrating significant signal detection across all algorithms employed. by Shiyu Wang (813972)

Trends in CT cases detected in Spain. by Borja Guarch-Ibáñez (19929316)

Model comparison and random effect. by Mulugeta Wassie (10803155)

Subjects:

Key significant pathways in the final models of self-compassion. by Eriko Takahashi (22608061)

Subjects:

S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Participant enrollment. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

S1 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Change in STAI scores after counseling. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

S1 Protocol - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”

Table_1_Partnership and relationship happiness in endometriosis related chronic pelvic pain: a multicenter case–control study.docx by Samia el Hadad (19844874)

“…</p>Conclusion<p>Given the significance of partnership in dealing with chronic diseases and the connection between symptoms of endometriosis and a decrease in partnership quality, it is essential to incorporate strategies that alleviate the negative impacts on relationships for both partners into medical support.…”

Cesarean section rate 2003-2017 among HSJ, control and Denmark. by Eva Rydahl (6260771)

Subjects:

Forest plots of APTT for 28-day mortality in different subgroups. by Huan Wang (109286)

Subjects:

Sociodemographic characteristics of stroke patients including lost to follow-up/missing data (n = 188). by Farayi Kaseke (19560197)

Subjects:

Baseline characteristics for HSJ, control and Denmark (without HSJ) in the preintervention period, N = 289.045. by Eva Rydahl (6260771)

Subjects:

Patient status overview. by Farayi Kaseke (19560197)

Subjects:

Baseline characteristics and potential independent risk factors for mortality of SFTS. by Huan Wang (109286)

Subjects: