Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
-
2261
-
2262
-
2263
-
2264
-
2265
-
2266
-
2267
-
2268
-
2269
-
2270
-
2271
-
2272
-
2273
-
2274
-
2275
Raw database.
Published 2025“…No consistent upward trend in PT scores was observed over the study period; scores decreased by 0.088 points per additional year (CI95% CI: −0.147 to −0.029, p = 0.003). …”
-
2276
CONSORT diagram.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2277
Raw data.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2278
Postoperative outcomes.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2279
Postoperative complications.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2280