Incidence rate ratios of negative binominal regression models for yearly rates of incident opioid users, L-TOT users and L-TOT discontinuers during 2009–2013 and 2015–2019. by Qian Cai (112039)

Subjects:

Demographic, comorbidity, concurrent drug, and opioid characteristics, among L-TOT users and L-TOT discontinuers between 2009–2019. by Qian Cai (112039)

Subjects:

Distribution of stable carbon and nitrogen values for pPOM and sPOM. by Nathan D. McTigue (10706460)

Subjects:

Key safety measures including adverse events. by Anuja Dokras (8679261)

“…Waist circumference (mean change (MC) −2.23 cm; 95% CI [−3.98, −0.49]; <i>p</i> = 0.01), BMI (MC −0.49 kg/m²; 95% CI [−0.88, −0.10[; <i>p</i> = 0.01), and android fat mass measured by DXA (MC −167 g; 95% CI [−264, −71[; <i>p</i> < 0.001) decreased in the COCP group over the study period whilst there was no statistically significant changes in these parameters in the metformin only group when compared to baseline.. …”

Expression of 20 CrBV genes in FAW at different time points following parasitism by <i>Cotesia ruficrus.</i> by Xian Li (201841)

5-HT supplementation induces mitochondrial damage. by Li Gao (131516)

Subjects:

Adverse event list. by Stefan Halbherr (21353882)

“…No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease −0.73; 95% CI; −2.1, 0.62; <i>p</i> = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; −2.6, 2.8; <i>p</i> > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease −1.27; 95% CI; −3.8, 1.3; <i>p</i> = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; −1.6, 2.4; <i>p</i> = 0.822). …”

Flow of selecting the study participants. by Kazuhiro Suzuki (160528)

Subjects:

P–P and Q–Q plots for assessing normality of residuals. by Kazuhiro Suzuki (160528)

Subjects:

Characteristics of the participants. by Kazuhiro Suzuki (160528)

Subjects:

Comparison of GHQ-12 total scores pre- and post- guideline change in the mask-wearing behavior. by Kazuhiro Suzuki (160528)

Subjects:

Analysis sample data. by Kazuhiro Suzuki (160528)

Subjects:

Multiple linear regression analysis for psychological distress (GHQ-12 scores). by Kazuhiro Suzuki (160528)

Subjects:

Amplitude for A/L = 0.29. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Top view of the experimental setup. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Amplitude for A/L = 0.338. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Parameters of energy harvesting. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Graph for Max Amplitude/Length at G_y = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Amplitude for A/L = 0.02. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”

Graph for maximum Frequency at G_y = 0. by Muhammad Hammad Bucha (21736111)

“…The flapping frequency, amplitude, and optimal power of the rough cylinders were analyzed and compared with that of smooth cylinders experimentally, and the optimum point () in terms of power was attained. Increased surface roughness significantly reduced power output, flapping frequency, and amplitude. …”