Search alternatives:
significant main » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
significant main » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
point decrease » point increase (Expand Search)
main decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), small decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Main test parameters.
Published 2025“…Computational fluid dynamic analysis indicates that the shear stress transport turbulence model gives high accuracy in simulating the vane main-stream aerodynamic performance. However, when the simulated surface temperature of the vane was compared with the cooling test data, in which the vane was 3D-printed, significant deviation of the surface temperature distribution was observed. …”
-
4
Does a correlation exist between delayed vaccination and a decreased vaccine confidence?
Published 2024“…Suffering motor/intellectual delay and the obstacles to vaccination process derived from caring for other siblings were associated with delay in second MMR dose. The VCI decreased significantly in first dose group as delay increases but did not change in the second one. …”
-
5
Summary of five key points guiding the Safe Steps evaluation and implementation.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Key safety measures including adverse events.
Published 2025“…Waist circumference (mean change (MC) −2.23 cm; 95% CI [−3.98, −0.49]; <i>p</i> = 0.01), BMI (MC −0.49 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 95% CI [−0.88, −0.10[; <i>p</i> = 0.01), and android fat mass measured by DXA (MC −167 g; 95% CI [−264, −71[; <i>p</i> < 0.001) decreased in the COCP group over the study period whilst there was no statistically significant changes in these parameters in the metformin only group when compared to baseline.. …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
-
20