Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
force decrease » forces increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
force decrease » forces increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search), fold increases (Expand Search)
-
2621
-
2622
-
2623
Relating the biophysical forces that govern bacterial adhesion to experimental data.
Published 2024“…In the absence of EDTA, adhesion of both strains increases as pH decreases. The electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged substrate and bacteria is reduced, as negatively charged phosphates in the LPS become increasingly protonated at decreasing pH. …”
-
2624
-
2625
-
2626
-
2627
Correlation between treatment-induced changes in lumbar motor control and N150 amplitude.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2628
-
2629
-
2630
-
2631
-
2632
Electrode montage and electric field distribution simulated with SimNIBS software.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2633
-
2634
-
2635
Toxicity of GO and GO-GA NPs on <i>C. maculatus</i> adults after 24h exposure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2636
Mean persistence (±SE) of GO and GO-GA NPs on <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
2637
Post-effect of GO and GO-GA NPs on progeny production of <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: -
2638
-
2639
-
2640
PT<sub>50</sub> values of GO and GO-GA NPs against <i>Callosobruchus maculatus.</i>
Published 2025Subjects: