Search alternatives:
significant potential » significant positive (Expand Search)
potential biases » potential bias (Expand Search), potential changes (Expand Search), potential biomarkers (Expand Search)
force decrease » forces increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
significant potential » significant positive (Expand Search)
potential biases » potential bias (Expand Search), potential changes (Expand Search), potential biomarkers (Expand Search)
force decrease » forces increased (Expand Search)
fold decrease » fold increase (Expand Search), fold increased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Egger’s publication bias plots for the assessment of potential publication bias.
Published 2019“…Asymmetry of the dot distribution between regression lines indicates potential publication bias. (A) For the risk measurement of CAL, the Egger’s plot did not show marked asymmetry, P = 0.601, t = -0.57, 95% CI (-3.22, 2.12), (B) For the risk analysis of rKD, the Egger’s plot did not show significant asymmetry, P = 0.950, t = -0.07, 95% CI (-4.87, 4.66), (C) For the evaluation of days of fever or hospital, the Egger’s plot also did not show significant asymmetry, P = 0.390, t = -1.09, 95%CI (-10.37, 6.19). …”
-
6
MiR-129-5p levels were decreased in mouse depression models.
Published 2025“…The Y-axis represents the fold change, while the X-axis indicates the significance of differential expression. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
OS correlation of differentially expressed miRNAs (> 2-fold increase or decrease in HCC vs normal livers), according to KMP; miRNAs in bold are significantly correlated with OS.
Published 2024“…<p>OS correlation of differentially expressed miRNAs (> 2-fold increase or decrease in HCC vs normal livers), according to KMP; miRNAs in bold are significantly correlated with OS.…”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Risk of bias of included RCTs.
Published 2025“…They also had either high or some concerns of risk of bias, according to Cochrane risk of bias version 2 assessment. …”