Search alternatives:
significant deviation » significant variation (Expand Search), significant elevation (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant deviation » significant variation (Expand Search), significant elevation (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
Parameter values.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
2
SD under different weights.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
3
Model framework.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
4
Vehicle travel time.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
5
SD under different penetration rates.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
6
Notation description.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
7
Five-stage speed adjustment.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
8
Mean TTC under different weights.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
9
SD and mean TTC under different weights.
Published 2024“…Safety performance is evaluated using Time-to-Collision (TTC) and speed standard deviation (SD) metrics. Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
-
10
-
11