Search alternatives:
significant predicted » significantly predicted (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search)
predicted values » predictive values (Expand Search), predictive value (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant predicted » significantly predicted (Expand Search), significant predictor (Expand Search), significant predictors (Expand Search)
predicted values » predictive values (Expand Search), predictive value (Expand Search)
gap decrease » gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
-
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
Actual FA values vs predicted values.
Published 2021“…<p>This is a scatter plot of actual FA values vs predicted FA values for one significant voxel <i>v</i> = (150, 80, 75) across 57 individuals.…”
-
148
-
149
Values of model parameters.
Published 2024“…With the continuous rise of traffic control intensity in different simulation scenarios, the cumulative number of cases decreases by a significant amplitude. While balancing the requirements for epidemic prevention and control and for tourist economy development, the model works out the control intensity to be 0.68, under which some traffic control measures are suggested. …”
-
150
-
151
Significance Values of Multi-Group Analyses.
Published 2025“…Academic exhaustion was the stronger predictor (β = 0.523, p < .001), followed by social connecteness to the campus (β = −31, p < .001), vocational difficulties (β = 0.274, p < .001), and course value (β = −0.256, p < .001). Except for the course value, and family educational level, all significant predictors had their effect on dropout intention through academic exhaustion. …”
-
152
-
153
Predictive significance of standardized uptake value parameters of FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma
Published 2019“…Our results showed that these four SUV parameters had predictive significance related to NSCLC tumor differentiation; SUVT/L appeared to be most useful overall, but SUVmax was the best index for adenocarcinoma tumor differentiation.…”
-
154
-
155
-
156
-
157
-
158
Probability of survival (A) and recovery from dialysis (B) according to the best cut-off value of % PCT decrease in patients with SIAKI receiving CRRT.
Published 2022“…<p>In all the study subjects (n = 649), patients with a % PCT decrease > 31% showed a significant increase in the survival compared with those with % PCT decrease ≤ 31% (28-day survival: 80.5 vs. 30.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
159
-
160