Showing 101 - 120 results of 103,915 for search '(( significant ((gap decrease) OR (a decrease)) ) OR ( significant rate increased ))', query time: 3.32s Refine Results
  1. 101
  2. 102
  3. 103

    Face detection rate. by Atsushi Nakazawa (15892700)

    Published 2023
    “…In addition, the empathy score of the AR group significantly increased after the training. Upon analyzing the correlation between personality and changes of physical skills, we found a significant positive correlation between the improvement rate of eye contact and extraversion in the AR group. …”
  4. 104
  5. 105
  6. 106
  7. 107
  8. 108
  9. 109

    Knockdown of <i>Nf1</i> in <i>Rdl</i>-expressing neurons decreases sleep and increases metabolic rate. by Elizabeth B. Brown (4582978)

    Published 2023
    “…<b>C</b>. There is a significant effect of genotype on metabolic rate during waking (two-way ANOVA: F<sub>2,188</sub> = 54.14, <i>P</i><0.0001). …”
  10. 110
  11. 111
  12. 112

    The 2x2 DID models of current drinking rate. by Duyen Thuy Nguyen (10457356)

    Published 2024
    “…In response to MUP, the likelihood of abstention increased along with a slight decrease in the prevalence of heavy drinking. …”
  13. 113
  14. 114

    Summary results of Model 3: Condition index (mg/cm<sup>3</sup>), D<sub>0</sub> = starting density, Temp Dir = temperature (°C) direction (- = decreasing, 0 = stable, + = increasing), Chl-a = chlorophyll a, Turb = turbidity, used as proxy for hydrodynamics stress, n.s = non-significant. by Jacob J. Capelle (17240528)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Summary results of Model 3: Condition index (mg/cm<sup>3</sup>), D<sub>0</sub> = starting density, Temp Dir = temperature (°C) direction (- = decreasing, 0 = stable, + = increasing), Chl-a = chlorophyll a, Turb = turbidity, used as proxy for hydrodynamics stress, n.s = non-significant.…”
  15. 115

    SD under different penetration rates. by Jianrong Cai (14245136)

    Published 2024
    “…Case study results show a significant decrease in SD as the CAV penetration rate increases, with a 58.38% reduction from 0% to 100%. …”
  16. 116

    S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”
  17. 117

    Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”
  18. 118

    S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”
  19. 119

    Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”
  20. 120

    Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…Forty-three participants in group 1 and 45 participants in group 2 had their pre and post anxiety scores analyzed. There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. …”