Search alternatives:
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
attention increases » retention increased (Expand Search), activation increases (Expand Search), infection increases (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant attention » significant potential (Expand Search), significant reduction (Expand Search)
attention increases » retention increased (Expand Search), activation increases (Expand Search), infection increases (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Regenerating axons are increased by ATRA and decreased by clodronate.
Published 2021“…Compared to PBS-treated, the number of regenerating axons is doubled by ATRA treatment, decreased by 30% by clodronate, and, in the case of ATRA combined with clodronate, is not significantly different.…”
-
2
-
3
-
4
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
12
-
13
The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim.
Published 2019“…The expectation–attention interaction was not significant for MSPCstim (χ2 = 3.47, <i>P</i> < 0.05) but was highly significant for MSPCres (χ2 = 19.56, <i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
-
14
-
15
Between-groups comparison of GIN and PPI values in control, tinnitus and PBMT groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20