Showing 21 - 40 results of 19,146 for search '(( significant ((gap decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant expected increase ))', query time: 0.42s Refine Results
  1. 21

    The expectation–attention interaction is significant for MSPCres but not MSPCstim. by Noam Gordon (661276)

    Published 2019
    “…Consistent with the colours used in the previous figures, attended images are represented by the dark green lines and unattended images by the light green lines, while the pink–red gradient indicates increasing expectation. The significance of the interaction term was tested using the likelihood ratio test between the full model and the reduced model, which excluded the interaction fixed effect. …”
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27

    Fig 4 - by Katayoon Montazeri (18389243)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
  8. 28
  9. 29
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36
  17. 37
  18. 38
  19. 39
  20. 40