Search alternatives:
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
141
-
142
-
143
Seed germination kinetics of M. stenopetala under the effect of different PEG concentrations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
144
-
145
-
146
-
147
Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i>
Published 2025“…Results are presented as mean ± SD. Ceramide: CER, Evogliptin: EVO. *(P < 0.05) significant vs. control group; <sup>$</sup>(P < 0.05) significant vs. …”
-
148
Percentage reduction (mean (±SD)) of RMNPI values (Δ%RMNPI) after brushing in selected areas.
Published 2021Subjects: -
149
-
150
-
151
-
152
-
153
-
154
-
155
-
156
-
157
The research process for the present study.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
158
The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
159
The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
-
160
Descriptive statistics of variables.
Published 2024“…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”