Showing 141 - 160 results of 25,579 for search '(( significant ((gap decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant impact decrease ))', query time: 0.72s Refine Results
  1. 141
  2. 142
  3. 143
  4. 144
  5. 145
  6. 146
  7. 147

    Evogliptin attenuates the phenotypic switch of VSMCs during CER treatment by decreasing the osteogenesis-associated genes <i>in-vitro.</i> by Razia Rashid Rahil (22772495)

    Published 2025
    “…Results are presented as mean ± SD. Ceramide: CER, Evogliptin: EVO. *(P < 0.05) significant vs. control group; <sup>$</sup>(P < 0.05) significant vs. …”
  8. 148
  9. 149
  10. 150
  11. 151
  12. 152
  13. 153
  14. 154
  15. 155
  16. 156
  17. 157

    The research process for the present study. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  18. 158

    The main effects of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  19. 159

    The interaction of PRGDP and Gi on SWB. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”
  20. 160

    Descriptive statistics of variables. by Feng Huang (62988)

    Published 2024
    “…Key findings include: (1) In temporal relationships, a 46.70% increase in GDP per capita implies a 0.38 increase in subjective well-being, while a 0.09 increase in the Gini coefficient means a 1.47 decrease in subjective well-being. (2) In spatial relationships, for every 46.70% increase in GDP per capita, subjective well-being rises by 0.51; however, this relationship is buffered by unfair distribution, and GDP per capita no longer significantly affects subjective well-being when the Gini index exceeds 0.609. …”