Results of parameter estimation and significance testing. by Zhongya Han (21387494)

Comparison between actual and predicted values. by Xueyong Pan (20390363)

“…The <i>T</i>_max of the battery module decreased by 6.84% from 40.94°C to 38.14°C and temperature mean square deviation decreased (<i>TSD</i>) by 62.13% from 1.69 to 0.64. …”

Prediction intervals and actual values. by Xiangyue Zhang (9251306)

Subjects:

TG predictive ability of significant coronary stenosis in NSTEMI patients. by Boaz Elad (9220724)

The actual response values and predicted response values of BDD tests. by Peng Zhao (128233)

T-test results(Values in bold indicate significant differences at 90% confidence). by Chongren Wang (6652616)

Measured and predicted values of sewage turbidity. by Peng Zhao (128233)

Predictive relevancy and predictive accuracy of conceptual model. by Ali Abid (9204631)

Median p-values and significant differences for forecasting time steps. by Yaopeng Han (22622718)

Expression Significance and Prognostic Value of GPR27 in Ovarian Cancer by Xiulan Peng (640576)

“…<p>This study explored the prognostic role of GPR27 and its predictive value to platinum-based therapy in ovarian cancer.…”

Significant motifs (E-value < 0.01) in <i>Rice</i>. by Zutan Li (10026009)

Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–Australia. by Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento (6146123)

Subjects:

Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–Brazil. by Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento (6146123)

Subjects:

Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–Australia. by Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento (6146123)

Subjects:

Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–India. by Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento (6146123)

Subjects:

Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed cases–India. by Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento (6146123)

Subjects:

Scatter plot—predicted values vs. actual values for confirmed deaths–Brazil. by Erick Giovani Sperandio Nascimento (6146123)

Subjects:

Predicted value of S1 station. by Yubo Zhao (3873457)

“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”

Predicted value of S3 station. by Yubo Zhao (3873457)

“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”

Predicted value of S2 station. by Yubo Zhao (3873457)

“…The model was tested at three different locations and the results showed that the model outperformed the other models, performing as follows: 0.5925, 0.6482, 6.3322, 0.8523, 0.8902, 0.9403; 0.4933, 0.4325, 6.2351, 0.8952, 0.7928, 0.8632; 0.2912, 0.2001, 4.0523, 0.7823, 0.8425, 0.8463 and the PICP values exceed 95%. The hybrid model demonstrated significant results in predicting dissolved oxygen concentrations for the next 15 days. …”