Search alternatives:
significant predictors » significant reduction (Expand Search)
predictors cases » prediction cases (Expand Search), predictors used (Expand Search), predictor names (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
significant predictors » significant reduction (Expand Search)
predictors cases » prediction cases (Expand Search), predictors used (Expand Search), predictor names (Expand Search)
mean decrease » a decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), step decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Predictors for significant complications in case and control group.
Published 2021“…<p>Predictors for significant complications in case and control group.…”
-
2
Regenerating axons are increased by ATRA and decreased by clodronate.
Published 2021“…Compared to PBS-treated, the number of regenerating axons is doubled by ATRA treatment, decreased by 30% by clodronate, and, in the case of ATRA combined with clodronate, is not significantly different.…”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Significant predictors of non-normalized G6PD activity among cases and controls.
Published 2021“…<p>Significant predictors of non-normalized G6PD activity among cases and controls.…”
-
7
-
8
Predictors of MDR-TB cases.
Published 2023“…Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression were used to determine the predictors of MDR-TB. Associations were considered statistically significant at a 95% confidence interval with a p-value of less than 0.05. …”
-
9
Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
10
-
11
-
12
Between-groups comparison of GIN and PPI values in control, tinnitus and PBMT groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Between groups comparison of BTT and threshold in control, tinnitus and PBMT groups.
Published 2024Subjects: -
19
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
20