Search alternatives:
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
differences were » differences emerged (Expand Search), differences became (Expand Search), differences model (Expand Search)
gender decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater increases (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
differences were » differences emerged (Expand Search), differences became (Expand Search), differences model (Expand Search)
gender decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
101
The significantly different dimensions.
Published 2023“…The texts in the observed corpus collected from four country websites of Daraz, a significant cross-border e-commerce platform, were tagged and analyzed using Multidimensional Analysis Tagger and SPSS statistical software. …”
-
102
-
103
-
104
-
105
-
106
-
107
-
108
-
109
-
110
-
111
Comparative analysis of significant cytokine differences.
Published 2025“…The overlapping region indicates cytokines that were significantly different in both PEF 100P vs. …”
-
112
Fractional anisotropy (FA) values were significantly reduced in the ipsilateral hippocampus, corpus callosum, and external capsule.
Published 2023“…<p>FA in the cortex initially dropped and then increased by 1 month, however, these changes were not significantly different from sham. FA values in the hippocampus were aberrantly reduced after severe injury at chronic 8- and 12-month time points. …”
-
113
-
114
-
115
The teeth were mounted in silicone molds.
Published 2025“…No significant differences were found among the other groups (P > 0.05). …”
-
116
The teeth were mounted in silicone molds.
Published 2025“…No significant differences were found among the other groups (P > 0.05). …”
-
117
The teeth were mounted in silicone molds.
Published 2025“…No significant differences were found among the other groups (P > 0.05). …”
-
118
Propensity score matching results, all factors were significantly different between the 2 cohorts prior to matching (p<0.0001).
Published 2021“…<p>Propensity score matching results, all factors were significantly different between the 2 cohorts prior to matching (p<0.0001).…”
-
119
-
120