Regarding the acidity of black soil tested across various fertilization durations, the control group (0Y) received no fertilization, while the treatment groups included soils that... by Xiaoxu Zhu (11764430)

Subjects:

E (soil aggregate stability energy) is the amount of energy required when 99% of the soil is disrupted, Ecrit (soil critical stabilization energy) is the energy required when the i... by Xiaoxu Zhu (11764430)

Subjects:

Composition ratio of each types of tuberculosis ASMR in 1990 and 2021. by Xue Li (285380)

Subjects:

DALYs number, ASDR under the age of 20 in 204 countries and territories in 2021. by Xue Li (285380)

Subjects:

Demographic information of participants. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Difference in various variables with different PA level. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Characterization and difference in various variables with different PA level. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Correlation results between PA and different table variables. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Correlation heatmap between physical activity and individual variables. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Cross-lagged panel model based on physical activity, aggressive behavior and Chinese language learning. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Cross-lagged panel model consistency test based on physical activity, aggressive behavior and Chinese language learning. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Comparison of the fit of multiple cluster analyses of the cross-lagged panel model. by Zixia Bu (21475019)

Subjects:

Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”

Supplementary Figs 1–7. by Juliane F. Tampé (19976538)

Subjects: