Search alternatives:
significant interest » significant increase (Expand Search), significant interaction (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
significant interest » significant increase (Expand Search), significant interaction (Expand Search), significant increases (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search), rate decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
16
-
17
Study selection criteria.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
18
PICOS criteria for the SLR.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
19
PRISMA flow chart.
Published 2025“…</p><p>MDMA-AT demonstrated significant improvement in BDI-II score compared to PT (19.7-point vs. 10.8-point decrease, respectively; p = 0.003). …”
-
20