Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
-
10661
Infection of CD 34
Published 2025“…<p><b>+</b><b> humanized mice resulted in decrease in pathogenicity in CTCF Infected mice.</b> A. …”
-
10662
NPF-NPFR pathway in LNd-LPN feedback circuit fine-tune cooling induced locomotion increase.
Published 2024“…(C, D) Optogenetic activation of LNds using CsChrimson (<i>DvPdf-Gal4>Uas-CsChrimson</i>, red line) decreases sleep and this decrease effect was enhanced by NPF RNAi (<i>DvPdf-Gal4>Uas-CsChrimson; Uas-NPF RNAi</i>; green line). …”
-
10663
Schematic diagram of monitoring points and units.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10664
The analysis procedure.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10665
Rank of mutation fitness.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …”
-
10666
Model monitoring points and units coordinates.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10667
Soil mechanical parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10668
Parameters of the contact surface.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10669
The schematic diagram of free-field boundary.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10670
Residual deformation parameters of soil.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10671
Soil fluid and liquefaction parameters.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10672
PL-Finn model development procedure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results demonstrate that unreinforced foundations exhibit systematic residual deformation due to liquefaction-induced sand flow, which is significantly reduced by gravel pile reinforcement. Both excess pore water pressure and pore pressure ratio decrease markedly after reinforcement. …”
-
10673
Key modeling details for CoVPF and controls.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, we found that accounting for epistasis was critical, as ignoring epistasis led to a 43% decrease in forecasting accuracy. Case studies showed that CoVPF delivered more accurate and timely forecasts for lineage expansions and inflections such as EG.5.1 and XBB.1.5. …”
-
10674
LSTM model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
10675
CNN model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
10676
Ceramic bearings.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
10677
Geometric contact arc length model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
10678
Indentation fracture mechanics model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
10679
Grinding particle cutting machining model.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
-
10680
Three stages of abrasive cutting process.
Published 2025“…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”