Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
1901
-
1902
-
1903
-
1904
-
1905
-
1906
-
1907
-
1908
-
1909
-
1910
-
1911
-
1912
-
1913
-
1914
-
1915
-
1916
-
1917
GWAS analysis using Cluster 2 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…The dashed line indicates the permuted threshold for genome-wide significance <b><i>p</i></b> = <b>3.68</b>×<b>10</b><sup><b>−5</b></sup>(0.05/1357 SNPs). …”
-
1918
GWAS analysis using Cluster 3 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…The dashed line indicates the permuted threshold for genome-wide significance <b><i>p</i></b> = 2<b>.80</b>×<b>10</b><sup><b>−5</b></sup>(0.05/1784 SNPs). …”
-
1919
GWAS analysis using only Cluster 1 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…The dashed line indicates the permuted threshold for genome-wide significance <b><i>p</i></b> = <b>4.03</b>×<b>10</b><sup><b>−5</b></sup> (0.05/1242 SNPs). …”
-
1920
GWAS analysis using Cluster 4 data (shown in S1 Fig).
Published 2024“…The dashed line indicates the permuted threshold for genome-wide significance <b><i>p</i></b> = <b>7.91</b>×<b>10</b><sup><b>−6</b></sup> (0.05/6314 SNPs). …”